Plasma - Hvorfor ?

Lennon skrev: min Nokia86 har feks OLED).

Lidt of topic. Hvordan er den nokia n86?

Jeg skal have ny mobil, og kan ikke finde ud af om jeg skal have n86 eller en samsung jet.

Lennon skrev: flemming larsen skrev: Lennon skrev: min Nokia86 har feks OLED).       Lidt of topic. Hvordan er den nokia n86? Jeg skal have ny mobil, og kan ikke finde ud af om jeg skal have n86 eller en samsung jet. OLED skærmen er lidt on topic - og den er RIGTIG fed (lidt tvivlsom i direkte sollys). Ridsefrit glas vægtede tungt, - og det ER sgu ridsefrit! Super taster (SMS). Super kamera. Elsker sliderkonceptet = ingen lommeopkald.Min eneste anke er at den er lidt stor og tung. Nokias S60 fungerer stabilt og hurtigt i min verden.

Ja, ok lidt on topic. De har jo begge oled.

Jeg har bare være inde i alle tdc butikker og prøve begge, men det bliver jeg ikke klogere af. Det er så 2 helt forskellige typer. Den ene en touch og den anden slide.

Og min sidste er touch, men vil også gerne prøve noget nyt. De ser rigtig gode ud begge to, men fuck det er svært at vælge denne gang, så det var rart at høre fra en som har den ene.

 

Et SED tv består i princippet af millioner af små CRT tv, så teknologien er slet ikke sååå ny endda. Det er reelt en forbedring af CRT teknologien, og der skal nok komme professionelle SED monitors, før vi får de første SED tv til "normale" forbrugere.

JesperLund skrev: Firebird skrev: Et SED tv består i princippet af millioner af små CRT tv, så teknologien er slet ikke sååå ny endda. Det er reelt en forbedring af CRT teknologien, og der skal nok komme professionelle SED monitors, før vi får de første SED tv til "normale" forbrugere. Og Al Queda skal have myrdet nogle patentadvokater så SED kan komme videre...

Nå, du forsøger at være vittig? Dårligt forsøg. Der er intet der kan forhindre Canon i at producere SED displays/tv. Selvfølgelig lancerer de ikke deres SED displays/tv så længe krisen raserer omkring på vores planet.

On 25 July 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed the lower court's decision and provided that Canon's "irrevocable and perpetual" non-exclusive licence was still enforceable and covers Canon's restructured subsidiary SED.^[21] On 2 December 2008, Applied Nanotech dropped the lawsuit, stating that continuing the lawsuit "would probably be a futile effort."^[15]

In spite of their legal success, Canon announced at the same time that the financial crisis of 2008 was making introduction of the sets far from certain, going so far as to say they would not be launching the product at that time "because people would laugh at them."^[15]

Canon also had an ongoing OLED development process that started in the midst of the lawsuit. In 2007 they announced a joint deal to form "Hitachi Displays Ltd.", with Matsushita and Canon each taking a 24.9% share of Hitachi's existing subsidiary. Canon later announced that they were purchasing Tokki Corp, a maker of OLED fabrication equipment.^[22]

In April 2009 during NAB 2009, Peter Putman was quoted as saying "I was asked on more than one occasion about the chances of Canon's SED making a comeback, something I would not have bet money on after the Nano Technologies licensing debacle. However, a source within Canon told me at the show that the SED is still very much alive as a pro monitor technology. Indeed, a Canon SED engineer from Japan was quietly making the rounds in the Las Vegas Convention Center to scope out the competition."^[23]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-conduction_electron-emi tter_display

-slettet-

Redigeret af cnn3 - 17-Oktober-2009 kl. 01:05

http://displaydaily.com/2009/04/27/nab-2009-the-season-of-th eir-discontent/ "It’s no secret that the tail (consumer TV market) wags the dog (professional monitor market) these days, and quite vigorously. The problem with that scenario is that the most popular flat-panel TV technology - LCD - is not being met with much enthusiasm by people who make a living by shooting, editing, and finishing movies and television programs.

Indeed, I had numerous impromptu conversations with colorists, editors, and chief engineers who expressed more resignation than enthusiasm about purchasing LCD monitors to replace their venerated, but now "out to pasture" Sony BVM and PVM-series CRT monitors. The consensus was that LCD technology, even equipped with LED backlights, still comes up way short in terms of black levels, viewing angles, and motion blurring."

I was asked on more than one occasion about the chances of Canon’s SED making a comeback, something I would not have bet money on after the Nano Technologies licensing debacle. "However, a source within Canon told me at the show that the SED is still very much alive as a pro monitor technology. Indeed, a Canon SED engineer from Japan was quietly making the rounds in the Las Vegas Convention Center to scope out the competition."

Sikke dog et tilfælde.

NAB 2009 Las Vegas fandt sted 17 - 23 april. En SED-ingeniør fra Canon spaserer rundt, og kigger på, hvad konkurrenterne har at byde på. Det skriver Peter Putman i sin artikel den 27 april. 30 april får Canon to laaaange patenter til produktion af SED. Sikke dog et tilfælde...

Hvorfor plasma? Fordi vi ikke kan købe SED monitors/tv. Endnu i hvert fald.

Redigeret af Firebird - 17-Oktober-2009 kl. 05:14